Controversial decision hurts: Support Sarita Devi's cause

Controversial decision hurts: Support Sarita Devi's cause: Yesterday, we witnessed one of the most ugliest moments in Asian games' history. The controversial decision was made in a boxing match ...

Is Don Bradman or Sachin greatest cricketer of all time?

Is Don bradman or sachin the greatest cricketer of all time?don bradman having a test average of 99.94 is considered to be better than Sachin Tendulkar.Most people say Bradman had to play on tough australlian and english conditions while Sachin Tendulkar played most of his matches on flat indian pitches.In addition to that Bradman's test average of 99.94 is way better than sachin's test average of 53.86.Having said all these still can we consider Bradman better than sachin?First of all,everyone's theory about flat pitches in india is nonsense.Of course in india ball won't seam or swing much but what it does is spin.Its more difficult to bat when ball is spinning.One thing we should consider is that Don Bradman had't played in india at all.Seeing the way australlians,english players and south africans struggling in india we have to assume that Bradman won't be as dominant as he was in aussie or english conditions.Other thing we have to take into consideration is that sachin has scored close to 16,000 runs compared to Bradman's 7000.That means sachin scored more than twice the amount of runs sored by Don Bradman.Not to mention the fact that sachin's supreme one day record of 18000 runs at an average of 45 makes him the best batsman of all time.Sachin ability to play on bouncy and seaming tracks can never be questioned after watching innings he played on Sydney,Capetown and Trent bridge.It is a fact that sachin can play on any tracks while we will never know whether Don Bradman can play on turning indian pitches.

is this the end of frank lampard's career for chelsea?

Frank Lampard joined chelsea in 2001.Ever since he joined chelsea he has been their best player.He even set record for 164 consecutive premier league appearances.He helped chelsea to win 3 premier league titles,1 UEFA champions league title,4 fa cup and 3 league cup.He is the only midfielder to score 200 goals in premier league and is in second place in all time premier league assist table.Even with all these achievements why is he not given another contract by chelsea management?.He is having a good season so far scoring 20 goals in all competition including friendlies and euro qualifier.so why is frank lampard not given another contract?Seeing the way he played this season he deserves another contract.With possibility of mourinho joining his old club chelsea, Lampard's chances to stay at chelsea is reduced further.Mourinho always favour young quick feet which suites his counter attacking style.so 34 year old frank lampard is not going to be in mourinho's plan.so is this the end of frank lampard's career for chelsea?